On Sunday 07 March 2010, Johan Cwiklinski wrote: Not that I know anything about BackupPC, but: > If I change the path in conf.d/BackupPC.conf ; users who have modified > the .conf file will get a conf.rpmnew file ; that's fine. If apache.users moves from /usr/share/BackupPC to /etc/BackupPC, it'll break these setups because the old conf.d/BackupPC.conf that is left in place still refers to the old location, no? > The ones who did not change the .conf file will have it replaced by RPM, > breaking the apache authentication. ...assuming apache.users was modified and the modified one is required for authentication to work? Is apache.users a config file? If it was not modified, nothing should break. But I'm guessing that it is a config file and people are supposed to modify it so it's likely that these setups would break as well. > Any thoughts about that? Not suitable as an update to released distro versions IMO. The way I've handled cases like this sometime is to do it only between distro versions, and try to do migration in package scriptlets for some conceivably common cases. And adding a note about this to distro release notes would not hurt. One example of such migration (that I'm not at all proud of, but AFAIK it ended up working fine) is %post in the vdr package. Hm, I see I've put a TODO comment to get rid of it in F-13 but have happily forgotten it... will do for F-14 right away ;) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
