On 06/03/10 20:14, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 03/07/2010 01:40 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
If that were the case, I'd have expected someone to bring it up in the
comments. No-one has.
I've never actually heard of anyone running FN-1 because they want a
'more stable' system; this thread was the first time I heard that
theory. In my experience, people run FN-1 because FN doesn't work for
some reason, or just because they installed it when it was FN and don't
want to take the time to upgrade...but that doesn't mean they want
'conservative' updates, necessarily.
A lot of users in our users list recommend and use a previous release
because they want more a more robust system with conservative updates
and do believe that using a older Fedora provides them with that since
the important bugs would have been found and fixed already and that's
one of the reasons I recommended that you subscribe to that list even if
you aren't actively participating so that you get a better idea of our
user base :-)
Rahul
then i seriously think we are following different lists :/
as adam's poll is starting to show the majority of fedora users choose
fedora for the fact that it is leading the way with the newer software
and that it has constant updates. (ie freedom,friends,features,first!)
this argument that most fedora users want a more stable system is not
what the fedora users i came across are after. tbh i think this whole
identity crisis is blown of of all proportion, you'd think that
something like this would have come with the fedora10 dbus probs or the
'stabilisation cannot be detected' not now with a little kde popup
window :0
|
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
