2010/3/6 Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 18:17 +0100 schrieb Michał Piotrowski: >> Hi, >> >> 2010/3/6 Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >> > While we are at it, here is another great update: >> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-3326 >> > >> > * New version introduced in F11. >> > * Doesn't fix any bugs but it's an enhancement only. >> > * Useless update description "update to 4.7.1". >> > * And *of course* it was pushed directly to stable, even in F-13. >> > >> > Dear maintainers, please stop this! >> > >> > Regards, >> > Christoph >> > >> >> Is there any Fedora update policy? > > Not yet, but we are working on it, see > http://jwboyer.livejournal.com/36737.html > >> Because I don't understand the >> criteria for Fedora package update. >> >> Why I can install KDE 4.4 in F11 and I can't install latest gnome? > > Because the KDE SIG uses different criteria than most of the other > packagers. > >> From my user point of view, I would prefer to don't have any >> significant updates in previous stable version - just security fixes. > > Fully agreed, but this is something we are discussing for the last two > weeks I have seen some discussions, but I don't follow them. I'm waiting for results ;) > and I don't expect an agreement in the near future. Pity. There are many Fedora policies that are useless for end users like me, but update policy would be quite usefull. > While I think > that the decision about an update should generally be up to the > maintainers, I think KDE or this update show that we were better off > with an official policy. > >> Regards, >> Michal > > Regards, > Christoph > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Regards, Michal -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
