On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 17:11, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > I think this is the first time i've seen a package version with a > release number that used non ascii characters. It will be fun to watch > how this sort of thing breaks existing tools > that have been explicitly or implicitly assuming ascii. yup that's the reason; it's a one off build to see how much of our infrastructure breaks with utf8 packages.....
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
