Hi, On 03/05/2010 06:56 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: > On 03/05/2010 02:52 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> One size does still not fit all, although this is a great idea for >> most packages in Fedora for packages in certain niches this is a bad idea. >> >> I've said this before (and got 0 response), I believe there should >> be some divide made between core packages (with core being quite big, not >> the bare essentials, but also most of all desktop environments, etc.) and >> non core packages. > > Well, the reason I didn't respond before is because I thought I had no > disagreement with what you wrote. It seems obvious to me that even if > we made a policy that Fedora was primarily stable once released, that > there would always be exceptions to that rule and things that should be > updated more aggressively. So I would not advocate for any policy that > was absolute and inflexible. There should be room for human judgment to > play a role. > Ok I'm very happy to hear that, and hope this will be clearly reflected in the final policy for this, Regards, Hans > -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
