On Wednesday 03 March 2010 16:43:37 Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 16:08 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > So why we can't use it as our advantage and fill this gap? > > We could very well fill that gap with rapid release cycles (every 6 > months) and updates for those releases that focus on bugfix and > security. That is a unique role that is not filled by any current Linux > OS. But then there's no need for two released and supported versions together (Fn, Fn-1). But if we use both - we can have even more power in filling this gap - Fn as current and Fn-1 as untouchable stable. Even consider rawhide as Fn+1 for really brave men ;-) I already posted it in more details. But from all comments it looks like people want something rock stable, well tested and for this - 6 month cycle is not very well suited. There's no time for development and then for proper testing - so lot of unfinished and not very well tested stuff goes into Fedora and it starts again - lot of updates, breaking stuff... In circle. Just my 1 Czech crown (we don't have any more equivalent to cents ;-) -- Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 731 455 332 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
