Re: Worthless updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 03 March 2010 13:07:16 Rakesh Pandit wrote:
> On 3 March 2010 16:23, Thomas Janssen wrote:
> [..]
> 
> > BUT, Fedora was my choice BECAUSE i get/got the latest and greatest.
> > Even without running rawhide/factory/cooker.
> 
> [..]
> 
> Well, update to latest release (every 6 month) and you will get latest
> and greatest anyway. Updating old releases to latest and greatest
> (features and new versions) has a cost, unless update is essential, or
> a serious bugfix or security fix.

It's bad to force users to update so often - it's not usually without problems 
and it's really big change. Read my proposal (in this thread branch, reply to 
akurtakov), I think it's nice compromise how to have stable and still current 
releases without pain, overhead for maintainers etc...

Jaroslav
-- 
Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 731 455 332
Red Hat, Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux