On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:07:29PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Jesse Keating wrote: >> > Ok... removing deprecated uses is a questionable at best update, but >> > here is the kicker. The perl in F11 is perl-5.10.0-82.fc11. So these >> > functions aren't actually deprecated in F11. So... why is this update >> > going out? What possible benefit does the user get from this? Does >> > anybody see this as a reasonable update to publish on F11? >> > >> >> the suggestion I had made at fudcon went something like this: >> >> 1. all packages being put in as updates would need to be marked as per >> the type of update. the default is 'trivial'. Options might include: new >> pkg, trivial, feature, bugfix, security >> >> 2. We would issue security updates whenever they happened. Issue bugfix >> updates once every 2 weeks. Everything else once a month. > > How about we keep updates and updates-testing more like they are and add > another repo like updates-stable that follows your policy and is the > only updates repo enabled by default. That sounds good. -- LG Thomas Dubium sapientiae initium -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
