On 03/03/2010 02:55 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: >> No data in the bodhi ticket. >> >> Rpm changelog says "Upstream update" > > This sucks. Your bikeshed ... > While it's fine for the RPM changelog to say that, it'd need > something more useful in the update notes, at which point the maintainer > would also have noticed the futility of this particular update. >> If I google for upstream and look for a changelog, I come to this: >> Ok... removing deprecated uses is a questionable at best update, but >> here is the kicker. The perl in F11 is perl-5.10.0-82.fc11. So these >> functions aren't actually deprecated in F11. So... why is this update >> going out? What possible benefit does the user get from this? Does >> anybody see this as a reasonable update to publish on F11? > > I sure don't. If you'd use perl you'd know the reason: CPAN. > I want new versions where it makes sense. This one clearly > doesn't. Thanks for providing evidence on a) bodhi's uselessness for feedback. b) how easy it is to cast violent, hostile hip-shot from the background of lack of backgrounds. Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
