On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 02:21:55PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Enrico Scholz wrote: > > > Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 12:37 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > >>> --> Processing Dependency: tor-lsb = 0.2.1.23-1200.fc12 for package: > >>> tor-0.2.1.23-1200.fc12.i686 > >> > >> This is where things go to hell. Why in the hell is tor-lsb /required/ > >> by tor? > > > > tor-lsb requires only lsb-core (which has a minimal set of dependencies), > > not whole lsb. Due to broken redhat-lsb packaging (there exist bugs > > filed aeons ago) lsb-core pulls in all the x11 stuff which is required by > > the complete lsb spec. > > > > True: > > repoquery -q --whatprovides lsb-core-noarch > redhat-lsb-0:3.2-7.fc12.i686 > > this one > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245494 > > and > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472633 The latter of these (really the same problem) claim to be fixed in rawhide. The question remains to which Fedora versions the fixed packaging will be backported. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel