On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Jesse Keating wrote: > This is the problem with arguing about a proposal that hasn't even been > written yet. You latch onto the one part you assume will be there that > is the most unreasonable, and use that as a tool to bash the entire > concept of the proposal (which hasn't been written yet). I'm sure there > is a Latin phrase for this, I just don't know it. He's created a strawman and is arguing against it. that's the logical fallacy. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
