On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > * Has ABI/API change (and is a Critical Path package) > > Wrong criterion, sorry. "Has ABI/API change and fails to include rebuilds of > the affected packages" should be the criterion, critical path or not is > irrelevant. But this is basically covered by "causes broken deps" already. > You can't assume that people are only using software we ship. If someone is using software they've custom developed (think a webapp). We've now forced them to do work. There's several use cases here, people building and shipping appliances, webapps, etc. Why would anyone agree to do development and choose Fedora if the target they're building for can change without notice? -Mike -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
