Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/1/2010 11:42 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I will note again that 0 karma doesn't mean that it's not been tested.
>
> I run here with updates-testing enabled, but often only report -karma
> when things break. There are just so many things in updates-testing,
> that I usually don't have time or energy to +1 all of them that work.
>    

I do the same.  One big issue with giving positive karma is that you 
probably aren't testing all use-cases for the software, so I'm hesitant 
to +1 just because it didn't explode.  It's important to know though 
that is *didn't* explode (which certainly would result in negative karma 
from any testers out there.  I still think there aren't enough testers, 
but neither should every tester give +1 to every package.

- Orion
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux