Re: Impasse on packaging JOGL and Gluegen

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 15:49 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 02/28/2010 03:39 PM, Henrique Junior wrote:
> > As Chen Lei said, the fact that JOGL needs this code may mean that it
> > will be blocked forever for packaging, but I do not particularly see a
> > big problem.
> > For more details, please, read the log in bugzilla and give your ideas
> > regarding this question.
> 
> AFAIK we have had problems like this before with various bits of Xorg
> (iirc) needing the sources of other bits to build.
> 
> The "usual" solution for this, is to give a package a -source subpackage,
> which contains the extracted sources (and installs them under
> /usr/src
> 
> So I think the best way to handle this is to package gluegen, and include
> gluegen's sources as a gluegen-source subpackage, and then make jogl
> BuildRequire gluegen-source.

Yeah, we did this for Mesa from FC5 through F9.  Certainly not ideal,
but such is life.

I wouldn't consider this a blocker for packaging, though I'd like to see
it fixed eventually.  Usually when this kind of source build dependency
exists it's not a trivial thing to fix.

- ajax

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux