Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:28:28PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:05:54 -0500, Orcan wrote:
> 
> > About rawhide: rawhide could/should contain more experimental stuff,
> > such as beta releases or cvs snapshots of actively and frequently
> > developed software.
> 
> Why? And what would be the benefit?

It would help to (to have such a repo, not necessarily to replace
Rawhide with it) to catch FTBFS bugs directly when the commit was done
upstream instead of just after they created a release. E.g. if Rawhide
contains the new gcc that is more strict, than it would be nice to know
that it breaks the current upstream SCM version of a package I maintain
directly, so it can be fixed sooner.

Regards
Till

Attachment: pgpfhXSHCXppb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux