Adam Williamson wrote: > This is simply bad faith. I have seen absolutely no suggestion that the > policy would be put out in such a way, and I can't see any basis you > have to infer that. The suggestion that a draft version of the policy > would be provided for feedback is not at all the same thing as what you > wrote above. As long as the policy was properly adjusted (or abandoned) > based on the feedback it received, what objection do you have? The fact that the vote with no clear policy at all was dangerously close to a 5:1 pass (in fact, as far as I can tell, if all the members who had previously approved of a similar proposal in the somewhat chaotic discussion had reiterated their +1, we'd have had something like 5 or 6 +1 votes) and that this was only stopped at the very last moment when mjg59 volunteered to write up a precise policy. At that point, the vote got deferred for 1 week, but after almost half of that time elapsed, I still haven't seen any draft policy, request for feedback etc. Isn't it natural that this leaves me really worried about what's going to happen on Tuesday? Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel