Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:22:25PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 04:14:37PM -0500, James Antill wrote:
> 
> > ...and as in all threads about this that I can remember, the obvious fix
> > to the above is having two repos. and let everyone who wants a giant
> > firehose of mostly working stuff can enable this second repo. if only we
> > could create this "testing of the updates" repo. surely everyone would
> > be happy.
> 
> It seems more like we need three repos then. The current situation
> works well enough for me and I do not remember that I ever wanted to
> downgrade something except that I am still missing kpdf/kprinter, but
> both went away in a distribution upgrade. But I was more often hit by
> not up to date packages in Fedora.

Since we have already two stable releases, this could also be solved by
further restricting the updates for FN-1 when FN is released.

Regards
Till

Attachment: pgpvDtWhRooEQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux