On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:16:43PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> I would like to collect feedback on this issue. If you want to disable >> direct stable pushes, why? Could there be a less radical solution to that >> problem (e.g. a policy discouraging direct stable pushes for some specific >> types of changes rather than a blanket ban)? On the other hand, if (like me) >> you DON'T want that feature to go away, please provide valid use cases. > > I just have another idea: Add the karma value to the repository > metadata and write a yum plugin to only install packages with a certain > amount of karma. I just checked that stable packages may still receive > karma, so then everyone can pre-select packages based on the karma. And > people for whom the current system works good enough, can disable it. > And security updates could still be installed using the yum-security > plugin. No thanks. I don't want a flood of abrt bug reports just because a yum plugin prevents the fix from going to some users. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
