On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 04:40:46PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > That was my suggestion. All I got was negative comments (AIUI, nobody else > wanted anything less than a majority of FESCo to be able to approve direct > stable pushes, at least nobody said otherwise in the meeting), and even > outright accusations of proposing ad personam rules: > [begin quote (from the meeting log)] > Feb 23 21:58:17 <notting> Kevin_Kofler: of course you'd say 1 FESCo > member, becuase from your statements, it sounds like you would intentionally > sabotage the process and approve everything > [end quote] Notting's statement was in response to your earlier: 23-02-2010 20:48:05 <Kevin_Kofler>: OK by 1 rel-eng member would be fine with me (I could just bug rdieter ;-) -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
