On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 16:23 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Because EPEL has to be very stable, so additional time spent in testing is > even better, for example for reasons you highlight below. I never said > that packages should not go through testing in EPEL! But Fedora is another > thing. The conclusion here is that it's OK for Fedora to be broken and unstable in it's releases. I call bullshit. It is very much not OK for this to happen. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
