----- "Josh Boyer" <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 08:14:13AM -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote: > > > >----- "Matthias Clasen" <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 13:16 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> > >> I think banning stable pushes is the right idea. None of your > reasons > >> is > >> very convincing. > >> > >My packages are rarely tested and I forget them in testing phase for > a > >long time. Also fixing BR don't need testing. I simply need push > >immediately the new/fixed package. > > If nobody is testing your packages sitting in updates-testing, then > maybe the > users of that package aren't hitting whatever you're fixing or aren't > otherwise > having other issues. What is the benefit of pushing an update if > nobody cares? > They don't care about bodhi and probably they don't know about it. > Also, doing an _update_ to fix a BR seems rather absurd. If there is > no > functional change to the package when doing the BR change, then there > is really > no reason to push an update for that. The same is true for spec file > comment > changes, or any other change that has no real impact to the package at > runtime. > > josh > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
