On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 19:43 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:46:14 -0500, Braden wrote: > > > > Upgrade from 12+updates to 13+updates+testing > > > > broken deps look like below. While several may be due to dead packages > > > that have been removed in 13, some are likely due to violated upgrade > > > paths and bad/missing Obsoletes for old subpackages. > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): > > > > [snip] > > > > > openvrml > > > > [snip] > > > > > openvrml-0.18.3-5.fc12.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.5 > > > openvrml-0.18.3-5.fc12.i686 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.5 > > > > This doesn't look to me like F12 updates are being factored in properly. > > Not true. Then I still don't understand this. openvrml-devel went away between F12 and F12-updates. > Btw, the report explicitly refers to "fedora-updates-12-i386" > and "fedora-updates-12-x86_64" in two of its section titles and lists > many packages found in those repos. > > > openvrml-0.18.3-10 is currently in F12 updates. > > Doesn't matter, because your quote is truncated. The two .i686 lines > you've quoted are about openvrml.i686 in the fedora-12-x86_64 repo (!). Yes, I missed that and consequently left some important information out of my quote. But I'm not clear on why it doesn't matter that openvrml-0.18.3-10 is currently in F12 updates. So what exactly is the upgrade path that's being tested and failing here? > It's multilib breakage. Some time between F12 updates and F13 you've > killed openvrml-devel, That's not quite accurate. openvrml-devel was killed between F12 (not updated) and F13. It was replaced by libopenvrml-devel; libopenvrml-devel already Obsoletes: openvrml-devel. These changes that are in F13 are also in F12 updates. > so openvrml is no longer chosen for the > multilib repo compose. Some packagers fix that with "self-obsoletes". > In the "openvrml" package: > > Obsoletes: openvrml < %{version}-%{release} > > That way, openvrml.x86_64 would replace an old/obsolete openvrml.i686, > if installed. I can do this; but I don't understand why the existence of libopenvrml-devel and its "Obsoletes: openvrml-devel" aren't sufficient. -- Braden McDaniel <braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel