On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 07:36:00AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 16:33 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > Is the branch freeze a week late or is it now the same as the alpha > > freeze? In the "Important Release Milestones" wiki page[0], the branch > > was scheduled for 2010-02-09, but on the F13 Schedule[1], the "Alpha > > Freeze" links to the "Alpha Freeze Policy", which redirects to the > > "Alpha Milestone", that then says the "Branch Freeze Policy" has to be > > followed. The schedule itself does not say anything about branching. > > It would help a lot to avoid duplicating content in the wiki, because it > > only leads to out-of-sync contents and makes it harder to update it. > > We are trying to track down the duplication and make canonical linkings. > > The branch freeze happens at the branch event, which is a week after > Feature freeze. It's no longer an "Alpha Freeze" per se, because the > tree remains "frozen" even after alpha. So how is the package set determined that builds the Alpha release? Is it everything which is pushed to F13 in Bodhi for 2010-02-24 at 20:00 UTC, which is the time of the GO/NOGO meeting? Or is the Alpha release first composed and then it is decided, whether it will be synced to the mirrors? > Unfortunately we're going to have some rough times with documentation as > most of the documentation in the wiki isn't updated for how things work > with no frozen rawhide, but we're working on it. If you find more > places that need updating, please add them to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_frozen_rawhide_announce_plan thanks! I added the differences between the F13 Schedule and the key milestones there. Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
