2010/2/16 Chuck Anderson <cra@xxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 03:25:24PM +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote: >> 2010/2/16 Chuck Anderson <cra@xxxxxxx>: >> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:26:54PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:16:42PM +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote: >> >> configuration can be in xorg.conf or in /etc/xorg.conf.d/. >> > >> > Can it be /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ instead please? It would suck to have >> > to look in two different places, /etc/X11/xorg.conf vs. >> > /etc/xorg.conf.d/ instead of having everything under one parent >> > directory. Thanks. >> >> I hope not. It's pretty fine to have a foo.d folder in /etc and not in >> /etc/foo/. > > Except I didn't recommend /etc/xorg.conf and /etc/xorg. > > /etc/X11 is where the X11 config bits live. All I'm saying, is make > the new xorg.conf.d live where all the other X11 config lives. > > Why would you want to have the new config: > > /etc/xorg.conf.d/* > > when the existing config files are: > > /etc/X11/xorg.conf > /etc/X11/fontpath.d/* > /etc/X11/xinit/* > > Unless you are going to move everything: > > /etc/xorg.conf.d/xorg.conf > /etc/xorg.conf.d/fontpath.d/* > /etc/xorg.conf.d/xinit/* That's how i understand the change. Like do it right and move everything to /etc/xorg.conf.d/* Maybe i could have said that in the first place. My bad. -- LG Thomas Dubium sapientiae initium -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
