On 02/15/2010 02:28 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/15/2010 01:48 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:49:47AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> On 02/15/2010 11:00 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: >>>> Following the steps from deltarpm example >>>> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange#Example_deltarpm) >>>> helps me to reproduce the DSO issue in local mock. >> >> This would have been necessary before the Feb 9, which is when the new >> linker made it into rawhide. I specifically started my run on Feb 10 >> after ensuring that the new linker was in rawhide, and that my copy of >> the tree was up-to-date, including that linker. > Which version of binutils exactly have you been using? > > > I noticed my rawhide mock caches contain > binutils-2.20.51.0.2-13.fc13.x86_64 > > while download.fedora.redhat.com carries > binutils-2.20.51.0.2-15.fc13.x86_64 > > > For reasons I don't yet now, mock doesn't install this (latest) version, > so I am ending up with the *13.binutils (likely a version predating the > chains) > > => I am inclined to think something is broken with the repos, their > mirrors or with mock. Update: Meanwhile I rebuilt my rawhide-mock from scatch (rm -rf /var/cache/mock) and observed this: - mock traversed 45 rawhide mirrors it considered to be broken before finding one it considered "current". - now my mock picked up binutils*-15.fc13 - I still can't locally reproduce the FTBS breakdown. Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
