Re: Draft of maintainer and sponsor responsibility policies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:20:08PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:08:36PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > 
> > packager group.  We want to encourage more sponsors to take on people that are
> > not yet good packagers but have the potential to grow into good packagers with
> > a little mentoring.
> > 
> > Updated policy drafts are here:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_sponsor_responsibilities%28draft%29
> 
> It is not clear to me how the changes in the draft policies address this
> issue.

I wasn't very clear here. What I mean is that I think that the 
current policy already doesn't put an obligation on the sponsor to
follow everything his sponsoree did, but help in case it is asked
for.

At the same time I also agree that it is not a bad idea to revisit
this policy and make it clearer, so I am all for the changes, except
for the bits I said in the previous mail.

--
Pat
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux