On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:04:33 -0600, Matt wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:06:06PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt wrote: > > > > > > > sylpheed-3.0.0-3.0.beta7.fc13 (missing_DSO_to_linker__http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking) itamarjp,cwickert,mschwendt > > > > > > How is package ownership determined? I have nothing to do anymore with > > > Sylpheed for F-13 or F-12. > > > > > Just a guess -- it's taking people in all of the non-EOL branches. Which > > means that F-11 is why you're on this list. > > This is what I use: > > function get_owners() > { > URL='https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugzilla?tg_format=plain' > OUTPUT=~/owners.list > > curl -u ${FASUSER}:${FASPASS} -F user_name=${FASUSER} \ > -F password=${FASPASS} -F login=Login "$URL" | \ > grep "^Fedora|" > ${OUTPUT} > } > > It's not restricted by branch. Should it be, and if so, what syntax? That URL is the same I user for the broken deps reports, of course. Haven't thought about that. Hmm, bugzilla doesn't handle a different owner per "Product Version" either, does it? So, the fine-grained options in pkgdb don't map into bugzilla, ... and not into the foo-owner email aliases either. That implies that package co-maintainers for old branches receive all bugzilla mail plus additional reports even if it's not about their branch. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
