Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:50:29AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
>> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
>> using rawhide from 2010-02-10
>>
>> This run includes the new default linker feature --no-add-needed.
>> This is responsible for 446 failures noted below.  See
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking for
>> further details.
>
> I'm mass-filing bugs right now.  The ones failing for Implicit DSO
> Linking will block 564245, which itself blocks F13FTBFS.  All other
> failures will block F13FTBFS as usual.
>
> If you've fixed your packages since 2/10, you can simply close your
> bugs CLOSED RAWHIDE.
>

If you file a bug against a package that is not broken (anymore),
shouldn't that be CLOSED NOTABUG? :)

Anyway, I came to my attention that there are false alarms such as:
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564757

Is there a way to filter these out automatically or do we have to do it by hand?

Orcan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux