On 02/12/2010 03:11 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > What I was really asking is if there should > be a source package so that upx could be built without having a second > copy of the SDK in another srpm? The previous editions lzma442, 443, 449, 457, 458, 459, all required *different* adaptations by upx. So a separate Fedora source package would have been of little value, except possibly as an indicator of the need for a -libs package. But during that time, creating a -libs package appeared to be incompatible with the licensing. [Today "LZMA SDK is placed in the public domain".] Until someone with enough authority standardizes the library package and its interfaces, and there is evidence that the library will be maintained, then each downstream must fend for itself. -- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
