Bruno Wolff III wrote: > We have an out of date version that isn't getting updated upstream and > we have a replacement library that uses a different API but which can > probably do what you want with some wrappers. > > I have an interest in this as well as the development version of squashfs > tools uses the latest SDK and won't directly work with either current > library. > > Bundling it wouldn't be permitted. > > Personally I'd like to see it replace the old lzma stuff, since xz > provides compatible utility programs and I don't think anything else is > likely to be using that library. Having three libraries doing almost the > same thing seems excessive. Yeah, please package the LZMA SDK as lzma-sdk, the sooner we can get an LZMA-enabled squashfs, the better! (The KDE spin could really use the saved space!) Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel