Re: Final (hopefully) privilege escalation policy draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Tony Nelson
<tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10-02-10 15:48:39, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Hi, all. So the privilege escalation policy went to FESco, who
>> suggested some minor tweaks and a final run-by the mailing lists
>> before it gets approved.
>>
>> I have now adjusted the draft -
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/
>> Draft_Fedora_privilege_escalation_policy
>> - to reflect all feedback from this list and from FESco. It will be
>> reviewed again by FESco next week. Please raise any potential issues
>> or further suggestions for adjustments before then. Of course, even
>> if the policy is accepted by FESCo it will not be set in stone and
>> changes and exceptions can be added in future as appropriate, but I'd
>> like to have it as good as possible at first :) thanks all!
>
> "Directly read or write directly to or from system memory" has an extra
> (or out of order) "directly".

How exactly is "system memory" defined? The term seems rather vague to me ...
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux