On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 16:40 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > 281 packages? Wov! (That's after the most often occurring problems have > > been already resolved, am I right?) > > > > + let's say 300 "regular" FTBFS bugs -- the F13 mass rebuild will be > > really great... > > To me, this shows that this "feature" is completely broken and should not > make it into Fedora, ever. I disagree with that. Previous changes to the build environment - even upstream GCC changes - have broken way more packages (every GCC .x release tends to break a lot of things temporarily). Just causing builds to break doesn't mean the change shouldn't be made... > > You sure it wouldn't be better to wait for F14 with this? With "no > > frozen rawhide" you can submit the changes into rawhide quite soon and > > everybody has time enough to work on it. > > +1. Why does this get rushed into F13 the day of the feature freeze? ...but I agree with this, it seems like very bad timing. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
