Re: LD Changes To Implicit DSO Linking Update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/2/9 Parag N(पराग़) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx>:
> when one of my package fails to build? Should I ask upstream to
> hardcode required DSO names in Makefile or we need to modify CFLAGS in
> %build section?

Most of the time upstream (myself included) just forgets to add a
library at the end of the LDADD line, so all I had to do was send a
trivial patch upstream to add "-lm" or something.

See here for an example:
http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=152993

Richard.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux