On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 03:38:27PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > On 01/28/2010 03:25 PM, Neil Horman wrote: > >On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:17:08PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > >>On 01/28/2010 01:02 PM, Neil Horman wrote: > >>>On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:55:47AM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > >>>>On 01/28/2010 02:03 AM, Neil Horman wrote: > >>>>>On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:46:33PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > >>>>>>Unfortunately it doesn't because of this: > >>>>>>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557386 > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Jirka > >>>>>> > >>>>>Bear in mind, Abrt could have fixed this any time in the past few weeks, they've > >>>>>just chosen not to. Jiri, you and I agreed that you would pursue a user space > >>>>>correction for this that I laid out for you if I proposed a kernel space > >>>>>solution. I can't help but notice you seem to have tossed that asside. > >>>>>Neil > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>Yes, I decided not to implement it, because I discussed the proposed > >>>>solution with few other engineers and nobody likes it and the > >>>>security/selinux guys wouldn't like it also. Please don't take me wrong, > >>>>the solution you've proposed is just a few lines of code, so it's not a > >>>>big problem to write it, but it's just a temporary workaround and would > >>>>require changing the selinux policy and to make it work fine. We can > >>>>take a vote and if there is enough people to support it then I' write > >>>>it, but I don't writing something to /proc/<pid>/ is a good idea. > >>>> > >>>>Jirka > >>> > >>>Well, thanks for comming to a conclusion about this without bothering to bring > >>>it back up with me, thats fantastic. The bottom line is, you saw that I was > >>>willing to try do what you wanted me to do, and concluded that you didn't need > >>>to do what I had asked you to do. Thats a lousy way to behave. > >>>Neil > >>> > >> > >>I'm sorry that you feel that way, but what would it change anyway? I > >>already told you my concerns about that on irc, yes I said I'll > >>implement it, but before that I went to discuss it with some of my > >>colleagues and no-one likes it for the same reasons I already told > >>you, > >>so what would be the point of repeating the same if I already knew > >>your opinion? > >> > >Because you told me you would, on irc we discussed it, you told me your > >concerns, I told you my thoughts on it, and we agreed that it was worth > >implementing. The fact that your collegues there agreed with you doesn't give > >you leave to conclude that this is my problem to fix, and just disregard what > >you said you would do. If it did, I would just assert that some > >co-workers here agree with my opinion and stop working on any solution you asked > >me to. I have half a mind to do exactly that. > > > > > > C'mon do we really need to make this into a fight? The reason why I > didn't implement it is that it would be temporary anyway and thus > doesn't worth the work, because it's not just that 10 lines of code > on ABRT side, it gets more people from different teams involved, so > that's why I decided not to do it. Yes, I should told you that and > I'm really sorry I didn't. > Apparently we have different recollections of what we discussed. Neil -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
