On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:05:04PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 03:42:47PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Tony Nelson (tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > > > same opinion here. I have actually used this for a while, adds > > > > > one more thing that needs be verified after system upgrades, not > > > > > very nice. > > > > > > > > Realistically, the conglomeration of configuration and scripts in > > > > /etc/sysconfing/network-scripts was never thought out well. But it's > > > > not worth dealing with the historical baggage to change it now. > > > > > > Perhaps there should be a default /sbin/ifup-local script that > > > dispatches to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-local/<interface>? > > > It could contain useful comments, including that it is by default > > > replaceable as its target directory is empty by default. > > > > ... which would then try and overwrite any prior user-created files > > in that place on upgrade. > > it could be in an optional package or declared config, noreplace. I do not > feel good about user-created files in /sbin. thought about it a bit more, I think it would be better to add a separate hook to /sbin/ifup calling config post-up scripts in /etc and leave /sbin/ifup-local alone. Richard -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
