On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Garrett Holmstrom <gholms.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> - in some circumstances (government, regulated companies) encryption >>> must be certified to the FIPS 140-2 standard >> >> I don't know this "standard". >> >> May-be this "fips standard" collides with the FHS, may-be this standard >> is defective? >> >> Do you have a pointer/reference to this "standard"? Does it really >> mandate pollution /usr/bin and thus $PATH? > > FIPS 140-2 is a US government standard for crypto system security. > Its full text is available at > http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cmvp/standards.html if you're > interested. > > I have no idea if it actually requires them to be alongside the > executables, but hopefully the link will help. It doesn't. Also, ugh. I'm the one who actually reviewed hmaccalc to get included in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (a separate review from the Fedora one), and pointed out this same problem, and it was done properly for RHEL5: $ rpm -ql hmaccalc /usr/bin/sha1hmac /usr/bin/sha256hmac /usr/bin/sha384hmac /usr/bin/sha512hmac /usr/lib64/hmaccalc /usr/lib64/hmaccalc/sha1hmac.hmac /usr/lib64/hmaccalc/sha256hmac.hmac /usr/lib64/hmaccalc/sha384hmac.hmac /usr/lib64/hmaccalc/sha512hmac.hmac /usr/share/doc/hmaccalc-0.9.6 /usr/share/doc/hmaccalc-0.9.6/LICENSE /usr/share/doc/hmaccalc-0.9.6/README /usr/share/man/man8/sha1hmac.8.gz /usr/share/man/man8/sha256hmac.8.gz /usr/share/man/man8/sha384hmac.8.gz /usr/share/man/man8/sha512hmac.8.gz It should be simple enough to just update the Fedora packages with the changes in RHEL5 and we can all go eat cake. But first, I'm going to go play some pickup soccer... -- Jarod Wilson jarod@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
