Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 11:44 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:

> > Package updates to ABRT
> > should receive a lot of testing in order to avoid rushed "stable"
> releases
> > that result in less useful bz tickets.
> 
> I agree, we (ABRT team) do a lot of testing before new release, but of
> 
> course can't cover all the cases :-/ Will try to pull-in some guys
> from 
> QA, as developer can never test it software, because it's hard to
> think 
> out-of-the-box and act like ordinary user.

I actually ran f12 with updates-testing all the time since f12 release
(except when I was in the UK) so I had all the abrt test updates running
here. The problem is that none of the apps I use really crash very much
so I didn't give it much real-world testing even then :)

need more unstable apps!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux