Re: libdrm vs mesa updates - update group for bodhi?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 05:03, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So I say libdrm was going to be karma'ed into updates, and
> I thought I'd disabled that but it all got confused a few days ago.

There was a bug with auto-karma that got enabled no matter what each
time you created / edited an update (see bug #353 in the Bodhi trac).

I fixed it some time ago, it's in Git, but I don't know if it's been
pushed to production yet.

> So I thought well I better push all the packages that depends on it
> into updates as well, and they'll all end up in one signing pass
> and everyone will be happy.
>
> Now somehow mesa is in updates without libdrm/xorg-x11-drv-ati/plymouth
> updates that should have gone with it.
>
> Do we have any way to do some sort of grouping in bodhi so as to
> avoid this happening.

You can simply put several packages in the same update.

However, once the updates were created, I don't think there is any way
to group them (at least I didn't see that in the code yet :). In case
it's not, it would probably be a nice feature for the upcoming Bodhi
2.0 rewrital.


----------
Mathieu Bridon
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux