Hi, Sometime in the past few weeks I've ended up as the package owner for emacs, without actually requesting it. I've previously been a co-maintainer (i.e. watchbugzilla, watchcommits, commit, approveacls), but haven't requested package ownership at any point, so I'm wondering what turn of events brought this about, and whether it's a bug with the pkgdb. If a package is orphaned by its owner, does the next person with commit access become the package owner or something like that? If so, I think that needs a bit more thinking. I'm not really grumbling about become the package owner (though I'm not sure I have enough knowledge of emacs internals to take on that role), though I am genuinely confused as to how this happened. Unfortunately the emacs package does seem to get bumped around various RH employees - it'd be nice if there was a bit more communication about this when it happens. Cheers, Jonathan. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
