Re: packaging a static library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 04:42:35PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
> 
> FWIW, I'm pretty sure this is not against current Fedora policies,
> assuming that the libtommath maintainer signs off on it and there is no
> conflict between the two packages.

Indeed, it is just a compat library (and I think that having a rightly 
packaged static library alongside wouldn't be bad). Nothing in fedora, 
however, should link against it, that would be against the guidelines, 
and also not very fedora-like.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux