On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 16:35 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: > Jussi Lehtola wrote: > > Even though any proven packager could do the change, that bug does not > > fall in the items listed in the proven packager policy [1]. You haven't > > listed any problems with the current package, you're just requesting a > > version upgrade. > > > The version of openvpn in EPEL is an upstream rc version. > The Changelog file upstream shows a lot of bugs have been fixed and it > would be nice to have it fixed in EPEL too. OK, that's starting to sound better. > > Version upgrades should be performed by the package maintainer. This > > especially holds in EPEL, which should be a slowly moving distribution. > > > In this case the bz is around 2.5 weeks old, with absolutely no response. > What is the policy to get the package updated in this case? See the nonresponsive maintainer policy at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
