On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 08:41 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: > On 12/22/2009 08:09 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 18:59 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: > >> Perhaps this should be locked down to private-$USERNAME-*? Otherwise, > >> anyone could push into a branch that I'm trying to work with. > >> > >> Also, I wasn't able to delete a branch that I had pushed -- not sure if > >> you meant to allow that. > > > > If the ACL system were to keep everybody in their own $username > > namespace, no two people could collaborate on a single branch, which > > kinda defeats the purpose of having the server side branch. > > Not entirely, as those two people could still pull from each other's > branches. Or as Hans said, some other namespace could be pushable for > the maintainers to collaborate on. > > Either we trust that no packager will ever misbehave, or we need to lock > this down... > > Josh > Since no official builds would be able to come from the private branches, and since you can create other branches from other devel points along the way, I think I'm going to fall on the side of "trust" here, since we can relatively easily clean up from either mistakes or malicious intent. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
