On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 11:46 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Linuxguy123 wrote: > > > digiKam 1.0.0 was released today. I think a lot of us are running > > 1.0-beta 6 installed via yum. Would it be possible to get 1.0.0 into > > F12 stable prior to Christmas ? > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/digikam-1.0.0-1.fc12 > > stable that quickly? I'd feel a bit uncomfortable without at least some > testing and positive feedback. Nice job providing a means for installation without building from source and so quickly. Good work. As for installation, doing a straight rpm -i over the -beta6 install resulted in a slew of error messages regarding file conflicts. I did a yum remove digikam and then an rpm -i and everything worked fine. Thanks again. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
