Re: All I want for Christmas is digiKam 1.0 in F12-stable...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 11:46 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: 
> Linuxguy123 wrote:
> 
> > digiKam 1.0.0 was released today.  I think a lot of us are running
> > 1.0-beta 6 installed via yum.   Would it be possible to get 1.0.0 into
> > F12 stable prior to Christmas ?
> 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/digikam-1.0.0-1.fc12
> 
> stable that quickly? I'd feel a bit uncomfortable without at least some 
> testing and positive feedback.

Nice job providing a means for installation without building from source
and so quickly.  Good work.

As for installation, doing a straight rpm -i over the -beta6 install
resulted in a slew of error messages regarding file conflicts.  I did a
yum remove digikam and then an rpm -i and everything worked fine.

Thanks again. 

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux