On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > >> I recently submitting Deja-dup, a backup program written in Vala for >> review at >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 >> >> Vala is described in more detail at http://live.gnome.org/Vala. Deja-dup >> like many Vala programs include both the Vala source code and the C >> "source code" to avoid a build time requirement of Vala and also because >> Vala is still in a rapidly evolving stage. Do I need to build from the >> original Vala source code or can I consider the machine generated C as >> "source"? > > For rygel to date I've used the C as "source" unless I've needed to > patch a bug or build issue with it when you then need to regenerate > it. > > Regards, > Peter > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > I'd probably compile the Vala source since that's what the upstream project is written in and just have the build require Vala. Just my opinion though. C is definitely the safe choice, but I think the more Vala is used and tested the better it will get. -Adam -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
