Le Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:04:27 +0000, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 19:11 +0200, Jussi Lehtola wrote: > > > > > Is there a way to include these requires properly ? (like adding > > > > directly /usr/bin/jpegtran and /usr/bin/tiffinfo in Requires). > > > Yes. > > > > > > Requires: /usr/bin/jpegtran > > > Requires: /usr/bin/tiffinfo > > > > > > Does it really just need the binaries and not the libs, just that > > > rpm would auto-Require the libjpeg and libtiff RPMs? > > > > And if it actually needs the binaries, then you can just put in > > Requires: libjpeg, libtiff > > and safely ignore the rpmlint warning. AFAIK resolving file > > dependencies is a lot slower than resolving explicit dependencies. > > +1: just requiring the library packages and ignoring the rpmlint > warning seems correct here, to me. You are smarter than rpmlint, > after all. rpmlint is just considering the case where you're adding a > library dependency, not realizing it will be automatically generated. > It is not considering the case where the library package includes a > binary that you need to depend on. I think I'll use : Requires: /usr/bin/jpegtran Requires: /usr/bin/tiffinfo so if one day these files are put in a different package than the lib, I won't be "surprised" Fabien Nicoleau -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
