Re: Electric Fence - still reliable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:07:04 +0100, I wrote:

> Fedora 12 with LD_PRELOAD=libefence.so.0.0 EF_ALLOW_MALLOC_0=1, what is
> more likely that these are false positives or real bugs?

It's hard to find GNOME/GTK apps that don't crash. One that works fine
in efence is "gnome-about".

Many non-GUI tools also pass. procps's w doesn't, and that's not a false
positive:

$ w

  Electric Fence 2.2.2 Copyright (C) 1987-1999 Bruce Perens <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx>
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

  ==> setlocale() usage bug, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/548711


$ eog

  Electric Fence 2.2.2 Copyright (C) 1987-1999 Bruce Perens <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx>
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

  ==> in ORBit corba-any.c  once more


$ evince

  Electric Fence 2.2.2 Copyright (C) 1987-1999 Bruce Perens <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx>

ElectricFence Aborting: free(91dcd80): address not from malloc().
Illegal instruction (core dumped)

  ==> in glib2 gslice.c  once more


$ emacs

  Electric Fence 2.2.2 Copyright (C) 1987-1999 Bruce Perens <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx>

ElectricFence Aborting: realloc(84203b8, 2037): address not from malloc().
Fatal error (4)Illegal instruction (core dumped)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux