Re: Why pavucontrol is not installed by default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 08:19, Rahul Sundaram
<sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12/17/2009 12:46 PM, Christof Damian wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 19:58, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> pavucontrol currently crashes (and pulseaudio) for me on one machine
>>>> and I need this functionality.
>>>
>>> File a bug.
>>
>> Could everyone on this list please assume that I filed a bug or found
>> the bug already reported if I mention a bug.
>
> Useful to add a reference to those bug reports in that case.

The thing is that the thread wasn't about this bug and I wasn't
complaining about the bug.

I just wanted to know in which direction pulseaudio is going. I could
as well have said: "In the future there will be no pavucontrol, how
will this be possible then".

I just find it annoying that some people seem to have "File a bug." in
their signature, when one should assume that on fedora-devel everyone
would file a bug for valid problems. It might and should be different
on fedora or the forums.

Christof

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux