Re: x86-64 on i386 (was Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:30:11AM +0000, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
>> And the remaining 0.1% of the work is probably the other 99.9% of the 
>> time. I think you massively underestimate the number of corner cases 
>> present in an utterly untested configuration.
>
> My data-point is that I ran an x86-64 kernel on i386 F10 for a few  
> months until I got tired of yum not being able to update kernel  
> packages. The kernel side apparently works fine AFAICT. The .1% is yum.

"It works for me" is a poor standard of support.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux