Re: dist-git proof of concept phase 1 complete

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 12:15 +0100, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
> Do you have any plan about hooks ?
> Since 1 package = 1 repository, does that mean package maintainers
> will
> be able to define their own hooks ? (bad idea) will we have some
> pre-defined hooks (like bz integration) ? or something like github
> webhooks or bitbucket brokers ?
> 
> 

We'll definitely have some mandatory hooks.  The first one we're looking
at is a hook to do branch level ACLs.  Also, I seem to recall that you
would need shell access to the remote repo in order to add a hook, so it
would not be possible for maintainers to add their own remote hooks.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux