On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 01:27:52PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > Le Lun 14 décembre 2009 12:45, Josephine Tannhäuser a écrit : > > > > of course this is a practicable rule, BUT > > the problem is upstream or the rule itself. > > > > kernels internal zlib is not a lib its a module, > > wordpress internal php-gettext is not a lib, its a php code file. > > > > The trick is to declare that a lib is not a lib and you can close the > > bug as not a bug... > > Easy cake.. > > This is playing with words. I'm sure that when the guideline was written lib > was intended as "some code in any language that can be shared". What is less > clear is the other shared components which are not code (resource files, > fonts, templates, etc) but there is no doubt at all in my mind on the code > part. > Just to make clear, Nicolas's interpretation is correct. Attempting to work around the problem by language lawyering does not promote better software. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgprcu9oWWvhD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
